Supported vehiclesCompatibility starts with the exact vehicle and ECU.
Coming soon for Windows. V1 is built first for Alfa Romeo Giulia and Stelvio 2.2 JTD / Multijet. The documented reference is a 2020 Stelvio with Bosch EDC17C69; other configurations require review.
- Configuration-specific
- Read-only workflow
- Documented reference
Documented reference configuration
Documented reference- Vehicle
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (2020)
- Engine
- 2.2 MultiJet / JTD
- ECU
- Bosch EDC17C69
- Protocol
- ISO 15765-4 CAN 29/500
- Platform
- Windows desktop
V1 scope does not approve every Giulia or Stelvio configuration. Year, ECU software, adapter and diagnostic mode still matter.
Current validation detail
One profile, described exactly.
The reference documents development on a 2020 Stelvio 2.2 JTD / Multijet with Bosch EDC17C69. It provides a starting point for comparison, not approval of every configuration in V1 scope.
What the development work covered
- Connecting a supported diagnostic adapter through a Windows COM port
- Verifying adapter response and supported standard OBD communication
- Establishing supported Alfa-specific diagnostic read communication
- Running Guided Capture across the six supported groups
- Writing structured local sessions
- Reviewing captured signals, missing signals and capture quality
- Creating SmartReport and local PDF exports from accepted evidence in completed diagnostic runs
Details to review separately
The reference year is 2020. Other model years, power outputs, transmissions, drivetrains, emissions variants, markets and ECU hardware/software revisions are not approved by that reference alone.
Understanding the reference
Evidence for a workflow, within a defined configuration.
The profile has been used for structured development and verification: the expected protocol and ECU family are identified, supported standard OBD and Alfa-specific read communication are part of the workflow, and Guided Capture collects recognised evidence for the supported groups.
What validation does not mean
- That every individual signal is available on every vehicle
- That every production-year variant behaves identically
- That every diagnostic adapter will work
- That every ECU software revision responds the same way
- That every vehicle fault can be diagnosed
- That every capture will be complete
- That the vehicle is mechanically healthy
- That any write operation is supported
- That another vehicle sharing the engine or ECU family is automatically approved
Validation is evidence that a documented workflow runs on a specific configuration. It is not a compatibility guarantee, and it is not a statement about the condition of any vehicle.
Guided Capture coverage
Six groups of diagnostic evidence.
Core / Standard is foundational and present in every capture. Guided Diagnostic normally combines it with one focused Alfa group. Hybrid Experimental remains available for controlled use but is not the recommended default.
Six groups of diagnostic evidence.| Group | Supported evidence | Recommended duration |
|---|
| Core / StandardFoundational | Engine RPM, vehicle speed, coolant temperature and control-module voltage. | 30–60 seconds |
|---|
| Turbo / AirFocused | Actual and desired boost pressure, intake-air quantity, boost-pressure signal and supported turbo-control positions. | 60–90 seconds |
|---|
| Fuel / InjectionFocused | Fuel consumption, total and desired fuel quantity, main and pilot injection quantities where available, and injector corrections for cylinders 1 to 4. | 60–90 seconds |
|---|
| EGRFocused | Supported high-pressure EGR opening, actual and target position, high-pressure EGR temperature and low-pressure EGR temperature. | 60–90 seconds |
|---|
| DPF / ExhaustFocused | Differential pressure, particle-filter and pre-catalyser temperatures, particulate-filter clogging and distance from the last regeneration. | 60–90 seconds |
|---|
| Oil / PedalFocused | Gas-pedal position and oil-degradation level. | 30–60 seconds |
|---|
Availability boundary
Capture coverage describes the evidence areas reviewed for the reference configuration. It is not a guarantee that every listed signal is returned during every capture, on every configuration. Signals that are unavailable stay visible as missing rather than being estimated.
Compatibility factors
What a review actually weighs.
These are review inputs, not a rejection checklist. A difference in any one of them raises a question to answer with evidence; it does not decide an outcome on its own, and not every factor is relevant to every configuration.
Vehicle
- Exact Alfa Romeo model
- Model year
- Engine and fuel type
- Power-output variant
- Emissions configuration
- Transmission or drivetrain where relevant
- Regional configuration
ECU
- ECU family
- ECU hardware identifier
- ECU software identifier
- Diagnostic protocol
Adapter and connection
- Supported diagnostic adapter
- Windows COM port availability
- Adapter firmware and behaviour
Observed behaviour
- Whether standard OBD communication succeeds
- Whether supported Alfa-specific communication succeeds
- Actual signal availability during a capture
There is no VIN lookup here, and no vehicle identification number alone can confirm compatibility.
Configuration dependency
Each link depends on the one before it.
This is why a model name cannot settle the question. The answer is produced at the end of the chain, by what the ECU actually returns.
Configuration dependency
- Vehicle configuration→
- ECU family and software→
- Diagnostic protocol→
- Diagnostic adapter→
- Windows COM port→
- Established communication→
- Recognised signals
A break anywhere in the chain changes what a capture can contain. A compatible vehicle with an adapter that cannot hold a stable connection still produces no usable evidence.
Review outcomes
Clear status instead of a vague promise.
A model selection can identify V1 scope. Confirming the exact configuration requires more information and, where needed, real diagnostic evidence.
Within V1 scopeA Giulia/Stelvio 2.2 JTD selection is within V1 scope, but cannot establish compatibility. ECU, software, year, adapter and diagnostic mode need evidence-based review.
- ECU identification may be needed
- Adapter and connection details may be needed
- Observed diagnostic responses may need review
Scope is not configuration approval or software access.
Configuration review requiredThe configuration differs in one or more relevant details, so support cannot be stated until those details are reviewed individually.
- ECU identification may be needed
- Adapter and connection details may be needed
- Observed diagnostic responses may need review
No compatibility claim is made at this stage, in either direction.
Evidence not yet sufficientThe available information is insufficient, or the configuration has not been validated. Support must not be assumed.
- Additional evidence is required
- No universal-support assumption applies
- The current workflow should not be assumed compatible
Not currently confirmed describes the state of the evidence, not a fault in the vehicle and not a permanent decision.
Why a configuration may not be confirmed
- Configuration details are incomplete
- The ECU identity differs from the reference configuration
- A different diagnostic protocol is in use
- Adapter behaviour is not supported by the current workflow
- Communication was never established
- Responses were not recognised
- No real capture evidence is available yet
Adapter and connection
The adapter is part of compatibility.
A configuration also depends on a reliable adapter connection. The current desktop workflow uses a Windows COM port and the communication conditions below.
Current requirements
- 01A diagnostic adapter supported by the current workflow
- 02Reliable detection by Windows
- 03An available Windows COM port
- 04Exclusive access to that port for the duration of a capture
- 05Stable serial communication throughout
- 06A successful adapter response before any vehicle request
- 07Successful supported standard OBD communication
- 08Supported Alfa-specific communication where the capture requires it
What a working connection does not establish
- That every OBD adapter works, whichever interface or standard it advertises
- That an adapter’s marketing claims prove compatibility
- That connection success means every Alfa-specific signal is available
- That the adapter alone determines whether a vehicle is supported
An approved adapter model and firmware list is not yet available. A COM port or an OBD compatibility claim alone does not confirm suitability.
Adapter and setup guidance→
Other configurations
Other configurations within V1 need individual review.
This review scope is limited to Giulia and Stelvio 2.2 JTD / Multijet within V1. Configurations that differ from the documented 2020 Stelvio / Bosch EDC17C69 reference need individual technical review. Similar engines or ECUs do not confirm compatibility; no broader Alfa support programme is offered here.
What individual review does not mean
- That the configuration is already supported
- That it is provisionally approved
- That a shared engine or ECU family carries the same status
- That support will be added
- That support will be added by any particular date
What evaluation depends on
- Access to accurate vehicle and ECU information
- Suitable real diagnostic captures
- Adapter behaviour the current workflow supports
- Available development capacity
Depth before breadth
Review needs to cover communication, recognised signals, capture quality and the completed diagnostic workflow together. Similar specifications alone cannot establish support.
Compatibility review
Details that help a future review.
These details may help a later technical review; you do not need to collect them to register interest. The interest page shows whether registration is open and does not approve a configuration or provide software access.
01Vehicle
- Alfa Romeo model
- Model year
- Engine designation and fuel type
- Power output, and transmission or drivetrain where relevant
- Market or regional configuration where relevant
02ECU
- ECU family
- ECU hardware identifier where available
- ECU software identifier where available
- Diagnostic protocol information where available
- How the ECU identification was obtained
03Adapter and Windows
- Adapter model and connection type
- Windows version
- The detected COM port
- Whether the adapter responds
- Whether standard OBD and Alfa-specific communication succeed
04Existing evidence
- The exact wording of any connection message shown
- Recognised ECU identification
- The capture group selected, and the signals captured
- Missing or waiting signals, and the capture-quality classification
- Whether the behaviour can be reproduced
Never send
- Passwords or account credentials
- Payment-card information
- Personal information unrelated to the review
- A full backup of your computer
- Any form of remote access to your machine
- Files still containing identifiers the review does not need
Do not send a VIN, registration documents or diagnostic files for interest registration.
Honest limitations
What a compatibility result never covers.
- Compatibility is configuration-specific.
- A model name alone is not sufficient.
- A shared engine family is not sufficient.
- An ECU family alone may not be sufficient.
- Adapter detection alone is not sufficient.
- Successful standard OBD communication does not guarantee that Alfa-specific signals are available.
- A validated workflow does not guarantee complete signal availability.
- Missing data does not automatically prove a mechanical fault.
- Compatibility does not guarantee a diagnosis or a repair.
- Compatibility does not replace professional mechanical inspection.
- A compatibility review is not automatic approval.
A confirmed status means the software can communicate with the ECU and capture evidence within a defined scope. It says nothing about the mechanical condition of the vehicle, the cause of a symptom, or the outcome of a repair.
Not part of the normal workflow
- ECU coding
- Proxy alignment
- Injector coding
- Adaptation writing
- Actuator control
- Active tests
- Forced DPF regeneration
- Fault-code clearing
- Tuning or remapping
- Immobiliser operations
- Firmware flashing
- Module programming
- Automatic repair
These define the current product boundary. They are not withheld features and no plan unlocks them.
Coming soonInterested in future validation?
Choose launch updates or interest in future validation. This is an expression of interest, not a verified Beta application. Neither choice establishes eligibility, selection, a licence or software access.
Contact support→